(no subject)
Aug. 10th, 2007 11:53 pm(Note: I have since edited this entry to reflect the slightly different background details of characters through the drafts.)
I have this problem.
When one writes a book in which one uses real-world minorities, it's a good idea, naturally, to have someone *of* that minority look over the book and point out places where one has screwed up royally. Even if one has attempted to talk/listen to people of that minority, done research reading, written the character first and the minority second, and done all the other things right one can do in the draft.
Except. That someone can't, usually, be a random someone. They have to be from a background where they could also, theoretically, critique the book *as* a book, and point out the other stupidity in the midst. They shouldn't be asked just to poke at the one aspect. They should also lend intelligence on most other aspects. If not writers, they should be well read and critical readers who can point to why they like, or don't like, a scene or character.
I have been terrified to ever find anyone to critique Bird of Dusk.
It's like this:
- The main character is gay. (Also, Irish, Welsh, and occasionally avian.) He's not part of the gay subculture, but I'm trying fairly hard not to make him come across as a girl in drag, even though he is also not traditionally masculine.
- However, there's another major character who is Anishinaabe (Sagkeeng First Nation) *and* gay. And I write from inside his PoV at points.
- And another, major PoV. She's Saulteaux/Vietnamese. She's divorced from both cultures, and has bought into mainstream cliches about both cultures (to the point where she actively makes bad choices "on screen" based on wildly incorrect assumptions about Vietnamese ideas of shame/dishonour). And she suffers from a mental illness similar to Schizophrenia. (Not intended to be related to either of her cultural backgrounds, but you can't help have it be in the eyes of readers.) The cultural divorcedness does come out in the end as a bad thing, and the Anishinaabe character mentioned above catches on and takes on a positive role in that part of her life. But that's late.
- Every character, of every cultural background, is intended to be Broken in some way (Some more obviously than others; see above.)
- I'm also occasionally concerned about the various other minority bit parts, at least mildly accurate teenagerness, and the fact that so many of these characters are from lower classes or from the street.
But also, this story doesn't take place in the 2000's. It's early-mid 1990's.* Technically, it doesn't take place in Winnipeg, but Damina-Riel has a similar, though not identical, culture. Except for the magic.
So, in short, I need someone at some point who is familiar with at least some of: mid-prairie First Nations, the gay community, and/or the 1990s as a teen or an adult. *And* is an avid reader. Of fantasy. Who can critique.
I can think of at least one possibility, and there might be more (I've been surprised before by fans I've known for years but never knew were also writers), but nobody whom I would feel comfortable approaching out of the blue.
Part of this is that I am instinctively timid about approaching people with anything that might cause them to find me annoying and wish me gone. Doubly when it involves questions of ethnicity, culture, religion, or other social groups who have suffered discrimination, or something else where they might have a right to be offended.
Part of it is also that I am still terrified about sending books off into the wild, and this one is a difficult book. I need to have some reason I can trust them, be it "They're a professional", "they're a friend" or some combination thereof. A friend might be able to recommend a friend of theirs, if the recommendation is glowy enough or I have at least a nodding acquaintance. But any further? I get the squidgy nerves. (Nonetheless: I disagree strongly that books are like the writer's children. When I send a story to someone to critique or reject, I'm not worried they'll hurt the story, as I would be if sending off my child. The story will sit there and be just fine; red pencil only mars the page. I'm worried the crit will hurt *me*.)
My reaction to this dilemma has, until now, been to keep this story close to my chest, so that the only person who has ever critiqued a draft of it is my mother. To just never ask anyone else to read it over at all, because I might be getting things so wrong they would get offended, not helpful. Because, well, how do I ask?
(And who?)
Of course, first of all of this, I have to finish more of the book. I started entering some of my hand-writing from the trip into the computer, but I'm not actually any further at all this whole week.
______________________________________
* Few cellphones, home computers and internet not remotely as pervasive, especially among lower classes. Major differences in school safety policies and parental surveillance expectations. No Gay Marriage; being out in school was considered vastly brave or vastly unlikely, as teacher or student. No 9/11 or W. And significantly less of my music collection.
I have this problem.
When one writes a book in which one uses real-world minorities, it's a good idea, naturally, to have someone *of* that minority look over the book and point out places where one has screwed up royally. Even if one has attempted to talk/listen to people of that minority, done research reading, written the character first and the minority second, and done all the other things right one can do in the draft.
Except. That someone can't, usually, be a random someone. They have to be from a background where they could also, theoretically, critique the book *as* a book, and point out the other stupidity in the midst. They shouldn't be asked just to poke at the one aspect. They should also lend intelligence on most other aspects. If not writers, they should be well read and critical readers who can point to why they like, or don't like, a scene or character.
I have been terrified to ever find anyone to critique Bird of Dusk.
It's like this:
- The main character is gay. (Also, Irish, Welsh, and occasionally avian.) He's not part of the gay subculture, but I'm trying fairly hard not to make him come across as a girl in drag, even though he is also not traditionally masculine.
- However, there's another major character who is Anishinaabe (Sagkeeng First Nation) *and* gay. And I write from inside his PoV at points.
- And another, major PoV. She's Saulteaux/Vietnamese. She's divorced from both cultures, and has bought into mainstream cliches about both cultures (to the point where she actively makes bad choices "on screen" based on wildly incorrect assumptions about Vietnamese ideas of shame/dishonour). And she suffers from a mental illness similar to Schizophrenia. (Not intended to be related to either of her cultural backgrounds, but you can't help have it be in the eyes of readers.) The cultural divorcedness does come out in the end as a bad thing, and the Anishinaabe character mentioned above catches on and takes on a positive role in that part of her life. But that's late.
- Every character, of every cultural background, is intended to be Broken in some way (Some more obviously than others; see above.)
- I'm also occasionally concerned about the various other minority bit parts, at least mildly accurate teenagerness, and the fact that so many of these characters are from lower classes or from the street.
But also, this story doesn't take place in the 2000's. It's early-mid 1990's.* Technically, it doesn't take place in Winnipeg, but Damina-Riel has a similar, though not identical, culture. Except for the magic.
So, in short, I need someone at some point who is familiar with at least some of: mid-prairie First Nations, the gay community, and/or the 1990s as a teen or an adult. *And* is an avid reader. Of fantasy. Who can critique.
I can think of at least one possibility, and there might be more (I've been surprised before by fans I've known for years but never knew were also writers), but nobody whom I would feel comfortable approaching out of the blue.
Part of this is that I am instinctively timid about approaching people with anything that might cause them to find me annoying and wish me gone. Doubly when it involves questions of ethnicity, culture, religion, or other social groups who have suffered discrimination, or something else where they might have a right to be offended.
Part of it is also that I am still terrified about sending books off into the wild, and this one is a difficult book. I need to have some reason I can trust them, be it "They're a professional", "they're a friend" or some combination thereof. A friend might be able to recommend a friend of theirs, if the recommendation is glowy enough or I have at least a nodding acquaintance. But any further? I get the squidgy nerves. (Nonetheless: I disagree strongly that books are like the writer's children. When I send a story to someone to critique or reject, I'm not worried they'll hurt the story, as I would be if sending off my child. The story will sit there and be just fine; red pencil only mars the page. I'm worried the crit will hurt *me*.)
My reaction to this dilemma has, until now, been to keep this story close to my chest, so that the only person who has ever critiqued a draft of it is my mother. To just never ask anyone else to read it over at all, because I might be getting things so wrong they would get offended, not helpful. Because, well, how do I ask?
(And who?)
Of course, first of all of this, I have to finish more of the book. I started entering some of my hand-writing from the trip into the computer, but I'm not actually any further at all this whole week.
______________________________________
* Few cellphones, home computers and internet not remotely as pervasive, especially among lower classes. Major differences in school safety policies and parental surveillance expectations. No Gay Marriage; being out in school was considered vastly brave or vastly unlikely, as teacher or student. No 9/11 or W. And significantly less of my music collection.