lenora_rose: (Wheeeeee!)
lenora_rose ([personal profile] lenora_rose) wrote2010-12-23 10:57 am

(no subject)

One of the things abut posting more sporadically is that it tends to leave out the strangest tings happening in one’s life.

Frex. I finished my query package for The Serpent Prince, and it’s been sent out, so far, to four agents (and I’m compiling a list, slowly, of fresh information on other good agents/agencies).

One already requested a partial, or, for those not in the business, the first 50 manuscript pages, off the summary and first 5 pages. (Squeeee – in case the analysis below leaves any doubt.)

This doesn’t put me as far ahead of the game as it sounds, since one agency asks people to send a partial right off the hop, as the query. SO she's not seeing a lot others wouldn't also see. Yet.

But. The agent in question puts her statistics up for all to see. She requests manuscripts or partials a bit less than once a week (exactly 8 in the 12 week span I checked, or 2/3). She gets an average of 167 queries a week. That is to say, 0.4% of the time, she asks for more. The odds at that point are STILL cruddy (I don’t recall how many new clients she picks up in a year, but I’d be surprised if the number was significantly higher than 1, and not surprised if it was lower than 0.5) but – they’re higher than 0.4% .

There are other ways this is a good sign, though, less obvious. If you’re good enough to get the attention of one agent, you’re good enough to get attention from more. It isn’t a random distribution; once you can write a coherent story and follow submission guidelines, you’re competing with at most the top 5%, and more likely with the top 2% or less. After that, it’s mostly a combination of personal taste, commercial viability, and timing. (I’ve heard even more grim statistics about the awfulness of the slush pile.) So it’s already an affirmation that I’m good enough for someone, even if the someone ends up being not-her.


I should know better than to get too hopeful. matociquala was just the other day talking about how poisonous is magical thinking. But there's a difference between thinking that wishing will make it so and trust that my abilities are really there.

(I also sent a short story to Tor.com. Because while I'm being optimistic and tryign to do something about this writing gig, why not?)

[identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com 2010-12-23 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Sometimes magical thinking is what keeps us going, so I don't know about the poison . . . I guess it depends on how it's used.

But fingers crossed! (Talking about more magical thinking)

[identity profile] lenora-rose.livejournal.com 2010-12-23 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
She was talking about the kind of magical thinking that says "If you think positive, bad stuff won't happen" (Which can get into "Bad things only happen to people who somehow deserved it", as well as to her example of "if you'd just think positive and *really* try, your cancer will go away"), or "Just because I want it, it will happen."

Positive thinking is good. magical thinking... is positive thinking taken beyond sense.

[identity profile] sartorias.livejournal.com 2010-12-23 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep.

[identity profile] forodwaith.livejournal.com 2010-12-24 02:19 am (UTC)(link)
Congratulations! Even though it's not (as you note) a sure thing, it's still encouraging news.

[identity profile] lenora-rose.livejournal.com 2010-12-24 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
I'll take encouragement where I can get it, some days. This has been a bit of a mixed December. (It's ALL looking up at this moment, though I could still succumb to the virus.)